Full question: Britain’s current system of submarine launched nuclear weapons, known as Trident, is coming to the end of its useful life and will soon have to be scrapped or replaced. The cost of replacing Trident has been estimated at 20 to 25 billion pounds. What do you think Britain should do when Trident reaches the end of its useful life?

All questions relevant to this website that were asked on the same poll:

• Should the UK’s nuclear weapon submarines continue to be based in Scotland or should they not?
• Replacing Trident will cost £20-25 billion. What should Britain do when Trident reaches the end of its useful life?
• Should Scotland be an independent country? (Scottish views)
• Does the UK need nuclear weapons more than, less than, or about the same as it did during the cold war?
• In an independent Scotland, should the UK’s nuclear weapons continue to be based here?
• What do you think Britain should do when Trident reaches the end of its useful life?
• Do you support or oppose the UK having nuclear weapons?